Actionable news
0
All posts from Actionable news
Actionable news in CB: CHUBB CORPORATION,

Other Events

This Current Report on Form 8-K is being filed in connection with a memorandum of understanding (the MOU) regarding certain litigation relating to the proposed merger (the merger) of The Chubb Corporation (Chubb or the Company) with and into William Investment Holdings Corporation (Merger Sub), a wholly owned subsidiary of ACE Limited (ACE), pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger (the merger agreement), dated as of June30, 2015, by and among Chubb, ACE and Merger Sub.

The litigation to which the MOU relates are ten putative class action lawsuits challenging the merger and naming as defendants Chubb, the Chubb board of directors, ACE and/or Merger Sub (collectively, defendants). The suits were filed in the New Jersey Superior Court, Somerset County, Chancery Division and are captioned:

The Sadie Nauy Charitable Found.

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al.

Anne Cutler

v.

John D. Finnegan, et al.

, C-012041-15 (filed July10, 2015);

Sidney Weiman

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al.

, C-012043-15 (filed July14, 2015);

Renee Sayegh

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al

., C-012045-15 (filed July10, 2015);

Judy Mesirov

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al

., C-012046-15 (filed July20, 2015);

Shiva Stein

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al

., C-012047-15 (filed July21, 2015);

Vladimir Gusinsky Living Trust

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al.

, C-012048-15 (filed July22, 2015);

Jane Schwartzman

v.

Zoe Baird Budinger, et al.

, C-012049-15 (filed July20, 2015);

Saunders

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al.

, C-012050-15 (filed July23, 2015); and

Polatsch

v.

The Chubb Corp., et al

., C-012051-15 (filed July23, 2015) (the Actions). The complaints filed in the Actions allege, among other things, that the Chubb board of directors breached its fiduciary duties by agreeing to sell Chubb through an unfair and inadequate process and by failing to maximize the value of Chubb. Several of the complaints also allege that Chubb, ACE and/or Merger Sub have aided and abetted these breaches of fiduciary duties. The amended complaints filed in the

Mesirov

,

Weiman

and

Schwartzman

Actions added, among other things, allegations that the preliminary Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by ACE on August3, 2015 contained material misstatements and omissions.

On October12, 2015, defendants and plaintiffs in the Actions entered into the MOU, which provides for the settlement of the Actions. The MOU contemplates, among other things, that Chubb will make certain supplemental disclosures relating to the merger, all of which are set forth below. Although the defendants deny the allegations made in the Actions and believe that no supplemental disclosure is required under applicable laws, in order to avoid the burden and expense of further litigation, Chubb agreed to make such supplemental disclosures pursuant to the terms of the MOU.

The settlement contemplated by the MOU is subject to confirmatory discovery and customary conditions, including court approval following notice to Chubbs shareholders. A hearing will be scheduled at which the New Jersey Superior Court will consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement. If the settlement is finally approved by the court, it will resolve and release all claims by shareholders of Chubb under New Jersey law challenging any aspect of the proposed merger, the merger agreement, and any disclosure made in connection therewith, pursuant to terms that will be disclosed to shareholders prior to final approval of the settlement. There can be no assurance that the court will approve the settlement contemplated by the MOU. If the court does not approve the settlement, or if the settlement is otherwise disallowed, the proposed settlement as contemplated by the MOU may be terminated.

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES

The following information supplements the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus dated September11, 2015 (the Proxy Statement) and should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety.All pagereferences in the information below are to pagesin the Proxy Statement, and terms used below have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement, unless otherwise defined below.

The following is added to the end of the second full paragraph on page 70

:

In addition, Chubb also engaged Lenz& Staehelin to advise with respect to aspects of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement involving Swiss law.

The following is added after the fourth sentence of the...


More